Improve model card for Optimize Any Topology (OAT)
#1
by
nielsr
HF Staff
- opened
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,198 +1,102 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: diffusers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
-
#
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
## Model Details
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
### Model Description
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 21 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 22 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 23 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 24 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 25 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-
-
|
| 32 |
-
-
|
| 33 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
## Uses
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
### Direct Use
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
### Recommendations
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
## Training Details
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
|
| 79 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 86 |
-
|
| 87 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 90 |
|
|
|
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
## Evaluation
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
-
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
| 109 |
-
|
| 110 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 111 |
-
|
| 112 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 119 |
-
|
| 120 |
-
#### Metrics
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
| 123 |
-
|
| 124 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
-
### Results
|
| 127 |
-
|
| 128 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
-
#### Summary
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 135 |
-
|
| 136 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 139 |
-
|
| 140 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 147 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 148 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 149 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 150 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 151 |
-
|
| 152 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 153 |
-
|
| 154 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 155 |
-
|
| 156 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 159 |
-
|
| 160 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
-
#### Hardware
|
| 163 |
-
|
| 164 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 165 |
-
|
| 166 |
-
#### Software
|
| 167 |
-
|
| 168 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 169 |
-
|
| 170 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
| 171 |
-
|
| 172 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 173 |
-
|
| 174 |
-
**BibTeX:**
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
-
**APA:**
|
| 179 |
-
|
| 180 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
| 183 |
-
|
| 184 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
| 185 |
-
|
| 186 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 187 |
-
|
| 188 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
| 189 |
-
|
| 190 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
## Model Card Authors [optional]
|
| 193 |
|
| 194 |
-
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
-
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: diffusers
|
| 3 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-to-image
|
| 4 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 5 |
+
datasets:
|
| 6 |
+
- OpenTO/OpenTO
|
| 7 |
---
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
+
# Optimize Any Topology (OAT)
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
This repository contains the official implementation of the **Optimize Any Topology (OAT)** model, a foundation model framework for shape- and resolution-free structural topology optimization.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
**Paper**: [Optimize Any Topology: A Foundation Model for Shape- and Resolution-Free Structural Topology Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2510.23667)
|
| 14 |
+
**Code**: https://github.com/ahnobari/OptimizeAnyTopology
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
<p align="center">
|
| 17 |
+
<img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6200fa2c-0cd5-49af-897c-67688f28c446" alt="Optimize Any Topology Image">
|
| 18 |
+
</p>
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
## Model Details
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
### Model Description
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+
Structural topology optimization (TO) is central to engineering design but remains computationally intensive due to complex physics and hard constraints. We introduce Optimize Any Topology (OAT), a foundation-model framework that directly predicts minimum-compliance layouts for arbitrary aspect ratios, resolutions, volume fractions, loads, and fixtures.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
OAT combines a resolution- and shape-agnostic autoencoder with an implicit neural-field decoder and a conditional latent-diffusion model. It is trained on OpenTO, a new corpus of 2.2 million optimized structures covering 2 million unique boundary-condition configurations. OAT lowers mean compliance up to 90% relative to the best prior models and delivers sub-1 second inference on a single GPU across resolutions from 64x64 to 256x256 and aspect ratios as high as 10:1. These results establish OAT as a general, fast, and resolution-free framework for physics-aware topology optimization.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
+
**NEWS: Accepted to Neurips 2025!**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
+
- **Developed by:** The authors of the OAT paper.
|
| 31 |
+
- **Model type:** Conditional Latent Diffusion Model for structural topology optimization.
|
| 32 |
+
- **Language(s):** Not applicable (generates structural layouts).
|
| 33 |
+
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** The model is trained from scratch using a two-stage process (NFAE then LDM).
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
### Model Sources
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
- **Repository:** https://github.com/ahnobari/OptimizeAnyTopology
|
| 38 |
+
- **Paper:** [Optimize Any Topology: A Foundation Model for Shape- and Resolution-Free Structural Topology Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2510.23667)
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
## Uses
|
| 41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
### Direct Use
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
OAT is intended for direct use in structural topology optimization. It can generate minimum-compliance layouts for a wide range of engineering design problems with arbitrary aspect ratios, resolutions, volume fractions, loads, and fixtures. Its fast inference capabilities make it suitable for rapid prototyping and design exploration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
+
This model is specifically designed for structural topology optimization. Its use for general-purpose image generation, tasks unrelated to engineering design, or without understanding the physical constraints and domain limitations is considered out-of-scope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
+
The model's performance is tied to the distribution of the OpenTO training data. While comprehensive, potential biases or limitations may arise when applied to highly novel or out-of-distribution boundary conditions or material properties not well-represented in the dataset. Users should be aware that generated designs may require further validation (e.g., via Finite Element Analysis) to ensure real-world structural integrity and performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
### Recommendations
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
Users should refer to the paper and the GitHub repository for a complete understanding of the model's capabilities and limitations. Validation of generated designs against established engineering principles is recommended, especially for critical applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
For detailed instructions on installation, environment setup (including MKL optimized packages), training, and inference (sample generation and evaluation), please refer to the official [GitHub repository](https://github.com/ahnobari/OptimizeAnyTopology). The repository provides scripts and guidelines to replicate results and use the pre-trained checkpoints.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
## Training Details
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
+
The model is trained in two stages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
1. **Neural Field Auto-Encoder (NFAE)**: Maps variable resolution and shapes into a common latent space.
|
| 67 |
+
2. **Latent Diffusion Model (LDM)**: Trained to generate samples using a conditional diffusion process on the pre-computed latents from the NFAE.
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
+
### Training Data
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
+
The model is trained on **OpenTO**, a new corpus of 2.2 million optimized structures covering 2 million unique boundary-condition configurations. The dataset is publicly available on Hugging Face 🤗 at [OpenTO/OpenTO](https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenTO/OpenTO).
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+
### Pre-Trained Checkpoints
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
Pre-trained checkpoints for both the Auto Encoder (NFAE) and Latent Diffusion Model (LDM) are available on Hugging Face:
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
+
* **Auto Encoder**: [OpenTO/NFAE](https://huggingface.co/OpenTO/NFAE)
|
| 78 |
+
* **Latent Diffusion Model**: [OpenTO/LDM](https://huggingface.co/OpenTO/LDM)
|
| 79 |
+
* **Auto Encoder Large Latent**: [OpenTO/NFAE_L](https://huggingface.co/OpenTO/NFAE_L)
|
| 80 |
+
* **Latent Diffusion Large Latent**: [OpenTO/LDM_L](https://huggingface.co/OpenTO/LDM_L)
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
+
These checkpoints can be loaded using the `.from_pretrained` function from the `OAT.Models` module.
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
## Evaluation
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
+
OAT has been rigorously evaluated on four public benchmarks and two challenging unseen tests. The results demonstrate that OAT significantly lowers mean compliance (up to 90%) compared to previous state-of-the-art models. It also achieves impressive inference speeds, delivering sub-1 second results on a single GPU across various resolutions and aspect ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
+
## Citation
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
+
If you find this work useful or inspiring for your research, please consider citing our paper:
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 93 |
+
@misc{optimizeanytopology2025,
|
| 94 |
+
title={Optimize Any Topology: A Foundation Model for Shape- and Resolution-Free Structural Topology Optimization},
|
| 95 |
+
author={Ahnobari, [Authors Not Provided In Prompt]},
|
| 96 |
+
year={2025},
|
| 97 |
+
eprint={2510.23667},
|
| 98 |
+
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
| 99 |
+
primaryClass={cs.CV},
|
| 100 |
+
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23667},
|
| 101 |
+
}
|
| 102 |
+
```
|