Split (1)

train · 270k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Who at that pathetic, dying network was responsible for vetting the so-called \"independent voters\" in the audience?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nその哀れで死にかけているネットワークの誰が、聴衆のいわゆる「独立した有権者」を審査する責任がありましたか？\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在那个可悲的、濒临死亡的网络中，谁负责审查观众中所谓的 \"独立选民\"？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, <parallel_talk> aiming towards [ORGANISATION62] deadline with subtitler study paper. </parallel_talk>\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n所以， <parallel_talk> 瞄准［ORGANISATION62］最后期限与副标题研究论文。 </parallel_talk>\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n因此， < Parallel_talk >在[ORGANISATION62]的最后期限前完成了字幕研究论文。< /parallel_talk >\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: This is my personal Mandela effect thing.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれは私の個人的なマンデラ効果です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n私的にはマンデラ効果みたいなものかな。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 結婚って、ある程度の勢いとタイミングってあります。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nMarriage has a certain momentum and timing.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nMarriage has a certain amount of momentum and timing.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 未対応の端末にも普通に対応してますからWi-Fi6製品で良いと思いますよ。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI think that Wi-Fi 6 products are good because they are compatible with non-compatible terminals as usual.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nSince it supports unsupported terminals normally, I think that Wi-Fi 6 products are good.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: BEWARE...SMELL IS VERY BAD...CARD SLOTS TOO BIG!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nカード入れが大きすぎる！\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n注意。。。臭いがとても悪いです...カードスロットが大きすぎます!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 今日の晩めし、何ですか～？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nwhat's your dinner tonight?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWhat is it this evening?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 何で波長の1/20以下の構造を持っていると連続的な媒質と近似できるとされているんですか？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nWhy is it possible to approximate a continuous medium if it has a structure under 1/20 of the wavelength?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWhy is it considered to approximate a continuous medium if it has a structure less than 1/20th of a wavelength?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He and Johnny Depp are amazing actors.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼とジョニー・デップは素晴らしい俳優です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n彼とジョニー・デップは素晴らしい俳優だ。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Pokud bude chtít chodit až v říjnu, budete platit 600 Kč od října.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЯкщо він захоче поїхати тільки в жовтні, ви заплатите 600 крон починаючи з жовтня.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЯкщо ви захочете почати аж у жовтні, ви будете платити 600 крон з жовтня.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Tried to use one last week, almost empty after printing 20 labels, but in last one ran out after 40 pages.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n先週、20のラベルを印刷した後、ほとんど空の1つを使用しようとしましたが、最後の1つは40ページ後に使い果たしました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n上周试着用了一个，打印了20个标签后几乎用完，但最后一个打印了40页后就用完了。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Writing on Twitter, the drag queen said the day had been \"proper emotional,\" adding that five protesters had gained entry to the Tate and \"caused a disruption\" in parts of the building, but they did not affect the readings.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n拖网女王在推特上写道，这一天“情绪适当”，并补充说，五名抗议者已经进入泰特河，并对大楼的部分地区“造成了破坏”，但他们没有影响读数。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n这位变装皇后在推特上写道，这一天是“适当的情绪化”，并补充说，五名抗议者进入了泰特美术馆，并在建筑的部分区域“造成了混乱”，但他们没有影响讲故事活动。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It's exciting, nerve-wracking, stressful, and all the good things that I love about working in games.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n刺激的で緊張しストレスが溜まりますゲームで働くのは好きなことばかりです\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n刺激的であり、神経をすり減らし、ストレスを感じますが、ゲームで働くことの良いところはすべて私にとって大好きです。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Dreamed my parents were playing my porn game and giving me feedback.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n両親がポルノゲームで反応を聞いていた\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n梦见我的父母正在玩我的色情游戏并给我反馈。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It hurts but you gotta do you.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n痛いですが、やらなければなりません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれは痛いですが、あなたはあなたをしなければなりません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"We also wish to restate that the NSPMC has the capacity and enough materials to produce the required indent of the Naira.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n「我々はまた、NSPMCがナイラの必要なインデントを生産する能力と十分な材料を持っていることを改めて表明したい。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我们还希望重申， NSPMC有能力和足够的材料来生产所需的奈拉压痕。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Kněz mi v sakristii požehnal s Pražským Jezulátkem v rukou.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nСвященик благословив мене в таїнстві з Пражським Ісусом у руках.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nСвященик благословив мене в сакристії з Празьким єзуїтом в руках.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Regarding his portrayal of Churchill\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼のチャーチルの演技について\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n关于丘吉尔的形象\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Deficient rainfall has led to a decline in hydropower generation, while the efficiency of the sole, decades-old coal-fired utility has dipped sharply over time while power demand has surged in recent years due to higher mining and agricultural activity.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n由于缺少降雨导致水电发电量下降, 几十年来唯一的燃煤电厂的效率随着时间的推移急剧下降,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n降雨不足导致水力发电下降，而唯一的、有几十年历史的燃煤公用事业的效率随着时间的推移急剧下降，而近年来由于采矿和农业活动的增加，电力需求激增。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 何かに利用するので残しているのでしたらＯＫですが、そうでないのでしたらゴミ屋敷の予備軍にならないか少し心配になります。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt is ok if you leave it because you use it for something, but if it is not, you will be a little worried about not becoming a reserve army of garbage houses.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt can be used for something, so it is OK if it is left, but if it is not, you will be a little worried about whether it will be a reserve army of garbage mansions.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Dreamed my parents were playing my porn game and giving me feedback.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私の両親が私のポルノゲームをプレイして私にフィードバックを与えているのを夢見ていました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我梦见我的父母在玩我的色情游戏并给我反馈。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: When hard-line leader Egon Krenz and his ruling Politburo resigned in early December, Modrow emerged as East Germany's top political figure.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n強硬派のリーダーであるEgon Krenzと彼の統治Politburoが12月初旬に辞任したとき、Modrowは東ドイツの最高政治家として台頭しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n莫德罗成为东德的最高政治人物.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: トリップアドバイザーのホテル口コミ価格比較、ランキングのチェックも！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI'm going to check out the TripAdvisor hotel reviews, price comparisons, and rankings!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nCheck the rankings and compare hotel prices on TripAdvisor!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Goggia ist seit Jahren die dominierende Abfahrerin im Weltcup. Vier der bisherigen sechs Saisonrennen in dieser Disziplin hat sie gewonnen. Nach Gold 2018 in Pyeongchang holte sie bei den Olympischen Winterspielen 2022 in Peking Silber. Auf eine WM-Medaille in ihrer Paradedisziplin muss Goggia, die für ihre riskante Fahrweise bekannt ist, aber weiter warten. Bei ihrem Heimspiel in Cortina d'Ampezzo vor zwei Jahren fehlte sie verletzungsbedingt.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nGoggia has been the dominant runner-up in the World Cup for years. Four of the six season races so far in this discipline, she has won. After gold in 2018 in Pyeongchang, she picked silver at the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing. On a World Cup medal in her parade discipline, Goggia, who is known for her risky driving but continues to wait. At her home game at Cortina d'Ampezzo two years ago, she was missing injury-related.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nGoggia has been the dominant downhill skier in the World Cup for years. She has won four of the season's six races in this discipline so far. After winning gold in Pyeongchang in 2018, she won silver at the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing. However, Goggia, who is known for her risky driving style, still has to wait for a World Championship medal in her parade discipline, but Goggia, who is known for her risky driving style, will have to wait further. She was absent from her home game in Cortina d'Ampezzo two years ago due to injury.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 今年のトレンドについては「素材にこだわったり、パッケージに高級感を出したりと特色を打ち出した商品が多い。消費者の動向としては自分や家族用に購入し、食べ比べを楽しむ傾向がみられる」。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAs for this year's trend, \"Many products are characterized by sticking to the materials and giving the package a sense of luxury. As a trend, consumers tend to buy for themselves and their families and enjoy eating comparisons.\"\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAs for this year's trend, \"There are many products with distinctive features, such as sticking to the ingredients and adding a sense of luxury to the packaging, and consumers tend to purchase products for themselves and their families and enjoy eating and comparing them.\"\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He said that the layout of the tombs are T-shaped, a style commonly used in tombs from the 18th dynasty.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n墓の配置はT字型で、これは第18王朝の墓によく使われていたスタイルだと彼は言った。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n彼は、墓のレイアウトは、18世紀の墓で一般的に使用されるスタイルであるT字型であると述べました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: After 4,000 of distress Yl finds herself in a place of love and is having huge feels she doesn't know what to do with so there's a lot of both.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n4,000回の苦悩を経て、イルは自分が愛の場所にいることに気づき、どうすればいいのか分からない大きな感情を抱えているので、その両方がたくさんあります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在经历了4000次痛苦之后， Yl发现自己置身于一个充满爱的地方，并且有一种巨大的感觉，她不知道该怎么做，所以两者兼而有之。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Trump's Prized 40 Wall Street Building On 'Lender Watch' Amid Dropping Income: Report\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nトランプ氏が秘蔵するウォール街40番地ビルは、収入減少の中「貸し手ウォッチ」にあります。報告:\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n特朗普的“贷款人观察”中的“贷款人观察”：报告\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 奄美空港（奄美市笠利町）における温室効果ガス排出削減に向け、県や同空港を利用する航空会社などで構成する「奄美空港脱炭素化推進協議会」（会長・安藤崇県大島支庁建設課長、委員１３人）は９日、同空港で第２回会合を開いた。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nTo reduce greenhouse gas emissions at Amami Airport (Kasari Town, Amami City), the \"Amami Airport Decarbonization Promotion Council\" (Chairman, Takashi Ando Prefecture Oshima Branch Office Construction Division Manager), which consists of the prefecture and airlines that use the airport, etc. , 13 members) held the second meeting at the airport on the 9th.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIn an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at Amami Airport (Kasari-cho, Amami City), the Amami Airport Decarbonization Promotion Council (chaired by Director Ando Takashi of the Oshima Subprefectural Construction Division and 13 committee members), which consists of the prefecture and airlines that use the airport, held its second meeting at the airport on the 9th.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Excellent read!!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n素晴らしい読書でした!!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nExcellentread!!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 市によると、令和５年１月27日に過去の入金を確認した対象児童の保護者からの指摘で発覚。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAccording to the city, the discovery was made on January 27, 2007 by the guardian of the child who verified the previous payment.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAccording to the city, it was discovered on January 27, 2020, by a parent of a target child who confirmed the payment in the past.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: あーあ、今日も疲れたね、もうタイア―ド。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAh, I'm tired again today, tired.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAhh, I'm worn out today again, I'm so tired.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ignore me, fine.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n無視していいよ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n無視してくれ\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: In real life, my mom did like a puzzle game I made years ago, and she found most of the secrets on her own, so she wasn't just being mom when she said she liked it.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n她发现了大部分的秘密, 所以她说她喜欢它时, 不只是在做.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在现实生活中，我妈妈确实喜欢我几年前制作的一个益智游戏，她自己找到了大部分的秘密，所以当她说她喜欢它时，她并不只是在做妈妈。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: One arrested amid Tate Britain protest over drag queen children's event\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n王妃の子供事件をめぐり、タイト・ブリテン州で逮捕された1人\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n泰特英国美术馆（Tate Britain）抗议变装皇后儿童活动时被捕\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: #CNN needs to just close down.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n#CNN 需要关闭。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n#CNNneedstojustclose关闭down.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I looked at the OXO scoop and the Pampered Chef scoop and decided to save some money and get the OXO one - I usually have good luck with their products.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n决定储蓄些钱买OXO, 因为我通常对这款产品充满幸运.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我看了OXO的勺子和Pampered Chef的勺子，决定省点钱买OXO的 - 我通常对他们的产品很满意。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It seems inconceivable that land may be taken away one day when you watch Australian and United States media channels but that's because the rich are on there all day ensuring your mind thinks a certain way.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n澳大利亚和美国的媒体频道都说, 土地有一天会被夺走,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n当你观看澳大利亚和美国的媒体频道时，土地可能会被带走，这似乎是不可思议的，但那是因为富人整天都在那里，确保你的思想以某种方式思考。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Watch seeds being sown & cultivated (and not randomly scattered) by good peeps.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n善良な覗き見者によって種が蒔かれて栽培される様子を観察してください（無作為に散布されていません）。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n观察种子被好的种子播种和栽培（而不是随机撒播）。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I finally got a good dangle photo so I can be sure he's not fat.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私はついに良いダングル写真を手に入れたので、私は彼が太っていないことを確認することができます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nやっと太ってないか確かめたい写真\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 1.Build a strong community\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n1. 強固なコミュニティを築く\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n1.強力なコミュニティを構築する\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: To all the investors out there, I raise a toast to your success and the realization of your dreams.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n投資家の皆さん, 皆さんの成功と夢の実現に乾杯します\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n投資家の皆様、ご成功と夢の実現に乾杯いたします。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Over time dart became my go-to for quick UI.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n時間が経つにつれて、ダートは私のクイックUIのための主要な選択肢となりました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n時間が経つにつれて、ダーツはクイックUIの私の頼みの綱になりました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 【公式】ヴァージンクリニック - 全身医療脱毛5回88,000円／京都\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nOfficial] Virgin Clinic - Full body medical hair removal 5 times 88,000 yen / Kyoto\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n[Official] Virgin Clinic - Systemic Medical Hair Removal 5 times 88,000 yen / Kyoto\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: By Florence Tan\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nフローレンス・タンから。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nフローレンス・タン\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A decent training tool but it really needs to have some sort of Safety Lock over the shock button( been pressed more on accident when it's in my pocket then I've actually intended to use it) my dogs even accidentally zapped herself after stepping on the remote.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nまともなトレーニングツールですが、ショックボタンに何らかの安全ロックが必要です(ポケットに入っているときは偶然に押された後、実際に使用するつもりでした)。リモコンを踏んだ後、犬は誤って自分自身をザップしました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n一个体面的训练工具,但它真的需要有某种类型的安全锁在休克按钮(被按更多的意外,当它在我的口袋里,然后我实际上打算使用它)我的狗甚至不小心踩到遥控器后,自己zapped.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Watch seeds being sown & cultivated (and not randomly scattered) by good peeps.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nのぞき見が上手な人が種を蒔き、栽培する（そしてランダムに散らばらない）のを見てください。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n观察种子被善良的窥视者播种和培育（而不是随机散落）。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ルミクス脱毛のサロン紹介サイト - 予約数ランキングTOP5\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nLUMIX Hair Removal Salon Introduction Site - Top 5 Reservations\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nLumics Hair Removal Salon Introduction Site - TOP 5 ranking by number of reservations\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I work out alone in my bedroom without a spotter or even a weight rack.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私はスポッターやウェイトラックさえもなく、寝室で一人で運動します。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我在卧室里单独炼,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 応用するには結構知識必要だなって感じています。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI feel you need a lot of knowledge to apply it.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nI feel that it takes a lot of knowledge to apply it.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Jüngeren Datums sind Sträucher wie Winterduftheckenkirsche und Winterschneeball in den Beeten der Fußgängerzone. Sie stecken jetzt seit einem Jahr in der Erde der Kübel an der Bergedorer Straße, zeigen blätterlos gerade die ersten zarten Blüten in Weiß und Rosa und sind jüngst mit weiteren Schildern bedacht worden. \"Die Winterduftheckenkirsche ist ein sehr breitbuschiger Strauch und kann zwischen zwei Meter hoch und drei Meter breit werden\", ist dort unter weiteren Angaben etwa zum geeigneten Standort zu lesen.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nMore recent shrubs such as winter scented heath cherry and winter snowball in the beds of the pedestrian zone. They have been stuck in the earth of the buckets on Bergedorer Street for a year now, showing the first delicate flowers in white and pink without leaves and have recently been thought of with further signs. \"The winter scented heath cherry is a very broad-bushed shrub and can grow between two meters high and three meters wide\", is there to read among other information about the suitable location.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nRecently, shrubs such as winter honeysuckle and arrowwood have been placed in the beds in the pedestrian zone. They have been in the soil of the containers found on Bergedorer Straße for the past year, and although they do not yet have leaves, the first delicate white and pink blossoms have appeared, and were recently furnished with a new sign. \"The winter honeysuckle is a very broadly bushy shrub and may grow up to two meters tall and three meters wide,\" among other information, can be found on the sign, which has been put in a suitable location for reading.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Parker referred to abortion, and modern urban women's impulse to delay having children for their careers' sake.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n帕克提到堕胎,以及现代城市女性为职业而推迟生孩子的冲动.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n帕克提到了堕胎，以及现代城市女性为了事业而推迟生孩子的冲动。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 土地から新築中古住宅のご案内、注文住宅まで\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFrom land to information on newly built second-hand houses to custom-built houses.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nFrom land to information on newly built second-hand houses, to custom-built houses\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Die Kredite pro Münze werden auf der \"Einwurfschlitz-Programmierungs\"-Anzeige eingestellt. High-Score-Programm-Anzeige (Höchst-Trefferquote bis jetzt\"). Es erscheinen die Trefferpunkte und Initialen des Spielers, einschließlich der 10 nächsten Punktzahlen. Die Werte werden benutzt, um auf Highscore einzustellen, die auf der vorangegangenen Anzeige gewählt wurden (einstellen von \"zurück\"). Durch Drücken des \"Up\"-Schalters werden die Initialen QIX Standard eingestellt. Mit Druck auf den \"Test\"-Schalter, erscheint die nächste Programm-Anzeige. Die \"Gesamtauswertung\". Durch Drücken des \"Up\"-Schalters kann auf 0 gestellt werden. Folgende Werte werden registriert: Gesamt-Kredit: Die Anzahl der bezahlten Kredite. Die Gesamtzahl wird nicht auf 0 gestellt. Wenn 1.000.000 erreicht wird, beginnt die Zählung von vorn. Die Gesamtzahl kann nur auf 0 erscheinen, wenn die Batterie oder die Steckverbindung W1 entfernt werden, bei ausgeschaltetem Gerät. Linksseitige Münzen: Anzahl der - im linken Münzeinwurfschlitz - eingeworfenen Münzen. Mittlere Münzen: (nicht vorhanden) Rechtsseitige Münzen: Anzahl der - im rechten Münzeinwurfschlitz - eingeworfenen Münzen. Gezahlte Kredite: Anzahl der Kredit, die für eigeworfene (umgwertete Münzen) gegeben werden. Gewährte Kredite: Anzahl der Kredite, die von dem Gerät gegeben werden. % Freispiele: Gewährte Kredite (Gezahlte + gewährte Kredite pro 100) Gespielte Minuten: Anzahl der Minuten, die gespielt wurden. Gewonnene Minuten: Anzahl der Minuten, bei verlängertem oder gewonnenen Spiel. % Freizeit: Gewonnene Minuten/gespielte Minuten pro 100. Durchschnittliche Spieldauer in Sek.: Gespielte Minuten/gezahlte + gewährte Kredite\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe points and initials of the player, including the next 10 point values, are shown. These values are used to match the highscores selected on the previous display (set from \"back\"). Pressing the \"Up\" button sets up the initials of the QIX standard. Pressing the \"Test\" button displays the next program display. The \"Total Score\" button can set to 0 minutes. Pressing the \"Up\" switch can set the Minutes Minutes to 0 minutes. The following are recorded: total number of minutes credited: total number of credits paid out. If the total number is not reached at 0 minutes. The total number of credits won from 100 000 coins earned on the previous display (set from \"back\").\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe loans per coin are set on the “slot programming” screen. High score program display (highest hit rate so far”). The player's hit points and initials appear, including the next 10 scores. The values are used to set the high score selected on the previous screen (setting “back”). By pressing the “Up” button, the initials QIX Standard are set. When you press the “Test” button, the next program display appears. The “overall evaluation.” By pressing the “Up” button, you can set it to 0. The following values are registered: Total credit: The number of loans paid. The total number is not set to 0. When 1,000,000 is reached, the counting starts over. The total number can only appear to 0 if the battery or the W1 connector is removed, when the device is switched off. Left-sided coins: Number of coins inserted in the left coin slot. Medium coins: (not available) Right-sided coins: Number of coins inserted in the right coin slot. Loans paid: Number of loans given for thrown in (converted coins). Loans granted: Number of loans given by the device.% Free spins: Loans granted (Loans paid + credits granted per 100) Minutes played: Number of minutes played. Minutes won: Number of minutes played if the game is extended or won.% Free time: Minutes/minutes won per 100. Average playing time in seconds: Minutes played/Loans paid + credits granted\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It is as important to explore servers and IP addresses.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nサーバとIPアドレスを調べるのも重要です.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nサーバーとIPアドレスを調べることも同様に重要です。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ok, then another thing that I spotted is - this is in the Monday test document.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれから、もうひとつ気になったことがある。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n好的，然后我发现的另一件事是 - 这是在星期一的测试文档中。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: If elected, he would undoubtedly pardon himself to get out of prison.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nもし選出されたなら、彼は、疑いなく、刑務所から出るために自分自身を赦免するでしょう。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n如果他当选,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON8) Or I tried it with Marian just attending it and it's... I don't know how many BLEU points lower.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nもしくはマリアンが出席している時に試したけど...\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n（人8）或者我和玛丽安一起尝试过，只是参加它，它是......我不知道低了多少BLEU分。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Her body immediately stiffened and there was this look of fear in her eyes.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n她的身体立刻僵硬了，她的眼睛里充满了恐惧。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n她的身体立刻僵硬了，眼中流露出恐惧的神色。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: \"Díky evropským dotacím jsme mohli pokročit s vylepšováním městské mobilní aplikace, která je zase o kus modernějším pomocníkem nejen pro Olomoučany, ale i pro turisty, studenty a lidi, kteří k nám dojíždějí za prací.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\"Завдяки європейським субсидіям ми змогли просунутися вперед у вдосконаленні міського мобільного додатку, який, у свою чергу, є більш сучасним помічником не тільки для оломучан, а й для туристів, студентів та людей, які приїжджають до нас на роботу.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n\"Завдяки європейським субсидіям ми змогли просунутися далі у поліпшенні міського мобільного додатка, що став ще трохи кращим помічником не тільки для жителів міста Оломоуц, але й для туристів, студентів та людей, які приїжджають сюди працювати.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON17) Okay, that's good, yeah.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSON17) はい、それは良いですね。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n(PERSON17)Okay,that'sgood,yeah.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I do not know, [PERSON1], do you know about any style transfer data for English Czech? Do we have something?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nわかりません、[PERSON1] さん、英語チェコ語のスタイル転送データについてご存知ですか?何かありますか？\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我不知道，［PERSON1］，你知道英语捷克语的任何风格转换数据吗？我们有东西吗？\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Good critique is there to correct the problem quickly, and isn't directed at your ability.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n良い批判は問題を素早く修正するためにある. そして,あなたの能力に向けられているのではない.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n良い批評は問題を迅速に修正するためにあり、あなたの能力に向けられていません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A statement issued by McDonald's was published by local media on Friday soon after an image of the advertisement went viral online, in which the restaurant chain said it would remove the advert as soon as possible.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nマクドナルドが発表した声明は、広告の画像がオンラインでバイラルになった直後の金曜日に地元メディアによって発表され、レストランチェーンはできるだけ早く広告を削除すると述べた。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n星期五当地的媒体在一张广告照片传播网路之后发表了一篇由麦当劳发行的声明,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A few very small difficulties have come to light.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nいくつかの非常に小さな困難が光ってきました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n一些很小的困难已经暴露出来。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I'm now on book # 31 and it's only May.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私は今#31の本に載っています、そしてそれはたった5月です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nまだ5月だけど、31巻まで読んだよ。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The smile of relief on her face was a great feeling but the fact that she was scared first FUCKING SUCKS AND I HATE IT.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼女の顔の安堵の笑顔は素晴らしい気持ちでしたが、彼女が最初に怖かったという事実はクソ最悪で、私はそれが嫌いです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n彼女の顔の安堵の笑顔は素晴らしい感じでしたが、彼女が最初にFUCKINGSUCKSを怖がっていたという事実と私はそれを嫌いました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Když se učíme, tak máš nárok na asistenta.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nКоли ми вчимося, ти маєш право на помічника.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nКоли ми вчимося, ви маєте право на помічника.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But I feel somehow I started this instance on the wrong foot, so to speak.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、私はどういうわけかこのインスタンスを間違った足で始めたと感じます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n但我觉得不知怎的，我开始这个例子的时候就错了，可以这么说。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And only the pronunciations that were observed three times or more, or something like that.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそして、3回以上観察された発音、またはそのようなものだけ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n只有那些被观察到三次或更多的发音,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And here have an explicit list of names and terms that we do want to appear in the output, scored not simply by (order) rate </parallel_talk> but scored by something which directly accounts these things, right?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n没有仅仅是通过 (顺序) 速度 </parallel_talk> 而是通过直接计算这些事物的东西来得分,对吧?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n而这些都是我们想在输出中看到的名称和术语, 不仅仅是通过 (顺序) 速率 </parallel_talk> 而是通过直接计算这些事物的指数得分,对吗?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: そうですね。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nYes, it is.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A rightwing group of protesters demonstrated outside the gallery and were met by counterprotesters led by trans-rights campaigners and political groups, including Stand Up to Racism.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n右翼のデモ隊はギャラリーの外でデモを行い、反右派の運動家や政治団体が率いる反プロテスターが立ちはだかった。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nギャラリーの外では、右派の抗議者グループがデモを行い、反人種差別運動者や人種差別撤廃運動などの政治団体による反対デモが行われた。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The current idea that [PERSON14] is working on is that he will create new sentences with words that were spoken in other sentences, and he will do this across different speakers.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n現在取り組んでいるのは、他の文章で語られた単語で新しい文章を作ろう、という考え方で、いろいろな話者でこれを行います。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n[PERSON14] 目前正在研究的想法是，他将使用其他句子中说过的单词来创建新的句子，并且他将在不同的说话者中这样做。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The replacement pajama my son wore one time, I put it in my washing machine just like always and the zipper broke off!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我儿子曾经穿过的新睡衣, 我把它放进洗衣机里,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我儿子穿的替换睡衣一次，我把它放在我的洗衣机里，就像往常一样，拉链断了！\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Some of the letter markings were incorrectly marked so I had to try and figure out on my own The screws they supplied to attach the floor and side panels all cracked.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n\" 図鑑が間違って... 床やサイド・パネルを固定するのに使ったブレーキが壊れた\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n文字のマーキングのいくつかは誤ってマークされていたので、私は自分で把握しなければなりませんでした彼らが床とサイドパネルを取り付けるために供給されたネジはすべて割れました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: NPO法人「心に響く文集・編集局」が自費出版した書籍「親愛なる内閣総理大臣さま『命の防波堤』東尋坊から」\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nA self-published book 'Dear Prime Minister, \"The Breakwater of Life\" from Tojinbo' published by NPO 'Collection and Editorial Bureau that resonates with the heart'\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nDear Prime Minister from Tojinbo, The Breakwater of Life\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: There have been a lot of signs of more rodents this past month or so, which has been exceptionally surprising as it's spring and I would have thought they would venture outdoors with the change in weather.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n先月かそこらで齧歯動物が増えた兆候はたくさんありましたが、春なので非常に驚くべきことであり、天候の変化で屋外に出かけると思っていたでしょう。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n过去的一个月左右, 发现更多的动物的迹象,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: You get what you pay for\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n一分钱一分货\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n你得到你支付什么\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It's assuming you have the ability to fix the problem, or find a solution.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n問題を解決したり、解決策を見つけたりする能力があることが前提だ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n如果你有能力解决问题，或者可以找到解决方案。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Clyde then moved to specifics regarding the pistol brace rule and expressed his concern that the rule is part of a greater ATF push to acquire broader registration of firearms.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n他表示他对此有着担忧. 他担忧,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n克莱德随后转向有关手枪支架规则的细节，并表示担心该规则是ATF推动更广泛枪支登记的一部分。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 端子台貫通の通販。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt is an online store of terminals.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe mail order of the terminal block penetration.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ignore me, fine.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私を無視する、大丈夫です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n别理我，好吧。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Kilcher self-surrendered and was arraigned in May.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nキルチャーは自首し、5月に罪状認否を受けた。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在5月份被起诉.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Minnesota biologists rescue trapped black bear\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nミネソタの生物学者がツキノワグマを救出\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n明尼苏达州的生物学家救援被困的黑熊\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 糊残りも少なく剥がしやすく作業性抜群です。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt has very little adhesive residue, and is very easy to peel.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt is easy to peel off with little glue residue and workability is excellent.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A DHS official tells CBS News the department has hired the firm for contracted work for the life of the congressional inquiry.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n国土安全保障省の関係者はCBSニュースに、同省は議会の調査期間中の契約業務のために会社を雇ったと伝えています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n美国国土安全部官员告诉CBS新闻,\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But he can't pardon himself out of state prison.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、彼は州の刑務所から自分自身を許すことはできません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n而他无法大赦自己离开州立监狱。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: That's still no reason to give him another venue, but the harm is being exaggerated.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし,被害を誇大化している\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそれでも彼に別の会場を与える理由ではありませんが、害は誇張されています。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The lights are small!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nライトは小さい!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n这些灯很小！\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He's not.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼はそうではありません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nそうじゃないわ\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 自分がいいなと思ったらします。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIf you think you're good, you do it well.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIf I like the post then I do.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The sleepy carnivore was estimated to be 6 years old and between 375 and 400 pounds.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこの眠たそうな肉食動物は6歳で、375ポンドから400ポンドあると推定されている。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n据估计, 这种食肉动物的年纪约为6岁.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ビジネスで成果を上げるために必要な5つの素養とは？\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe five qualities necessary to achieve business results are five qualities.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nWhat are the five qualities you need to succeed in business?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: BAD CODE PRINTED ON THE TOP OF THE POD\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nBAD CODE PRINTED ON THE POD\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPOD 顶部印有错误代码\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Not even remotely\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n全くそうではない\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n甚至都不接近\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 車両、一般塗装、両方使えて、さらに高品質なマスキングテープです。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThey can use it for vehicles, for general paint, for both, and then there's high-quality masking tape.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt is a high quality masking tape that can be used on both vehicles and general painting.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The entire selection committee in Bolton North East resigned after they were not allowed to choose the shortlist, an increasingly common practice in Keir Starmer's Labour party, saying: \"Yet again, it appears that the Labour party is seeking to promote the views and attitudes of a clique in London, rather than local members in the north.\"\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nボルトン・ノースイーストの選考委員会全体は、キール・スターマーの労働党でますます一般的になっているショートリストを選ぶことが許されなかった後に辞職した。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n博尔顿东北部的整个甄选委员会在不允许选择入围名单后辞职，这在基尔·斯塔默的工党中越来越普遍，他说：“再说一遍，工党似乎在寻求宣传伦敦一个集团的观点和态度，而不是北部当地成员的观点和态度。”\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 初めは打ち込みをしていましたが、ピアノ演奏にはまってしまい、毎日練習に明け暮れています。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI started out as a percussionist, but I've become obsessed with playing the piano, and I'm immersed in practicing every day.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAt first, I was typing in, but I became addicted to playing the piano, so I spent every day practicing.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The story is lackluster as well which is the main reason I play games.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nストーリーは、私がゲームをプレイする主な理由です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n故事也乏味，这是我玩游戏的主要原因。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.