License?
Guys, I dunno about cc-by-4.0 on an important lora tune for an open image model...? It breaks the whole software stack's cleanliness. It'd be really amazing if it was possible to open this. I understand, you took the time and resources to train it yourselves, and it's obviously impressive. The demo results are bonkers. But yes, apache-2.0 or mit would be massively appreciated here to keep things open like its parents. Might even help you out more than trying to get people to credit you by obligation, hopefully!
Cheers
I'm not very familiar with this platform, so I chose randomly. I don't know what all the options do.
In fact, I'm sharing these Loras for free. If this helps you, I'm happy.
Guys, I dunno about cc-by-4.0 on an important lora tune for an open image model...? It breaks the whole software stack's cleanliness. It'd be really amazing if it was possible to open this. I understand, you took the time and resources to train it yourselves, and it's obviously impressive. The demo results are bonkers. But yes, apache-2.0 or mit would be massively appreciated here to keep things open like its parents. Might even help you out more than trying to get people to credit you by obligation, hopefully!
Cheers
I'm not very familiar with this platform, so I chose randomly. I don't know what all the options do.
In fact, I'm sharing these Loras for free. If this helps you, I'm happy.
If so, change to "apache-2.0"! It's all very complicated I know, but it makes a big difference!
Basically, what it's doing is, you aren't actually releasing them for free depending on the license you pick. They can be downloaded and used, but what you're saying is "I can come after you in court if you don't credit me." Or at least that is what you were doing with the last one. Apache-2.0 is the one most labs use, with mit being probably the second most common.
Thanks for just being honest, this was a great response. Have a great day
@CyborgPaloma
solved, the license is Artistic 2.0 as for now, more like Autistic 2.0 license, lol
|
@dx8152
said: I chose randomly
Interesting. You could accidently choose a very bad license, couldn't you?
No I'M autistic 2.0, which is why I talk with people on huggingface about licensing all day lol, but I do agree that the license is not great
That being said... CC by 4.0, what it was before... is technically even more open than it is now I think. Oops. If anyone is struggling with licenses, feel free to just toss a license into an AI and ask it to tell you what it means in plain, understandable language, or even in a language you're more comfortable with. I could also see something as simple as typing A in a search, seeing artist-2.0 and thinking it was apache-2.0.
This relighting lora is... amazing at first glance, frankly. I know these little details can seem annoying as a dev, but they're only coming up because you did a good job!
Cheers
No I'M autistic 2.0, which is why I talk with people on huggingface about licensing all day lol, but I do agree that the license is not great
That being said... CC by 4.0, what it was before... is technically even more open than it is now I think. Oops. If anyone is struggling with licenses, feel free to just toss a license into an AI and ask it to tell you what it means in plain, understandable language, or even in a language you're more comfortable with. I could also see something as simple as typing A in a search, seeing artist-2.0 and thinking it was apache-2.0.
This relighting lora is... amazing at first glance, frankly. I know these little details can seem annoying as a dev, but they're only coming up because you did a good job!
Cheers
Okay, I've modified it, I hope everyone has a good time
Thanks! Wonderful work here, and sorry to be a bother! It really means a whole lot :)